Swiss voters get a say next month on whether to lock a harder version of neutrality into the constitution — no peacetime NATO training, no sanctions unless the United Nations has already voted them. The referendum is on 27 September in Switzerland. Reuters, datelined Zurich on Wednesday, said posters of doves have gone up around the country. One recent poll had 62 percent against and 36 percent in favour, though campaigners for the change are outspending the other side, pollster Fabio Wasserfallen said, and the gap could move.
Neutrality has been recognised since 1815 and written into the constitution since 1848. It is not defined there in any detail. The 1907 Hague Convention is what actually says a neutral country cannot let its territory be used for war and has to stay impartial between the sides. Christoph Blocher, the veteran Swiss People’s Party politician behind the campaign, told Reuters that status is already gone because Bern copied the European Union’s sanctions on Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. He said Switzerland has not had a war for 200 years because it stayed armed and neutral, and that a third world war may not be far off. The initiative, tabled by Pro Suisse, would bar Switzerland from joining or cooperating with any military or defence alliance unless it is attacked, and from joining sanctions that the UN has not approved.
Moscow has noticed. Foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who is herself under Swiss sanctions, wrote that “flexible neutrality” means there is no neutrality at all. The Federal Council and parliament reject the initiative without a counter-proposal. Official Swiss foreign ministry material says the country already does not join NATO, already takes UN sanctions, and would lose the room it needs to train with partners before an attack, not after one. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis has said the change would hurt national security and would stop joint exercises with NATO. Franz Perrez, the foreign ministry’s head of international law, said the current formula is understood and that adopting the measures would not make Switzerland more neutral.
Laurent Goetschel, a political scientist at the University of Basel, told Reuters that posters with the slogan “No to war, yes to neutrality” could appeal to people who do not fully understand how neutrality works, and that how it is handled should be left to the government, not fixed in the constitution. All major parties except the Swiss People’s Party oppose the measure. The government has already used its present flexibility this year, including a ban on overflights by U.S. military aircraft during the Iran conflict. The vote does not ask whether Switzerland stays neutral. It asks how tight the box should be.
Sources: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs; SWI swissinfo.ch; Swiss Federal Council.
